Claymore

The design of Claymore
D3 Cly 01

1. Romanesque letters. Klosterneuburg Altar, Nicholas of Verdun, 1181

D2 Cly 02

2. Lombardic letters from Liber regimenti acutorum, late-13th century. Detail of a picture shown in The Smithsonian Book of Books

The Romanesque period saw huge changes in the design of letters; eventually culminating in a new style – the Gothic capital.

In A History of Lettering Nicolette Gray describes this period (roughly eleventh to twelfth centuries) as one of great experimentation for the capital letter. Where specific attention was given to varying the elements of letter design; questioning stroke thickness, which, if any of the diagonals should be thick or thin, and mixing square and round forms of the same letter. Pretty much anything goes. [fig 1]

D4 Cly 01

3. From bronze Lombardic letters which appear on the monument of Henry 3rd in Wesminster Abbey c.1272, shown in Alphabets & Numbers of the Middle Ages by Henry Shaw

This free-for-all approach to the letter’s classical heritage developed to become the round Gothic capital, often referred to as Lombardic. The principal shape being circular and preserving much of the feeling of uncials. They’re often heavily decorated and became the prominent form for initial letters and versals in manuscripts. Its medieval characteristics also made it a favourite choice of letter style for the Gothic Revival and Arts & Crafts movements. [figs 2, 3, 4]

The additional stroke
The experimentation of the Romanesque capital together with the wild extravagances of the Lombardic hold some of the ideas found in Claymore. One detail that can’t fail to be noticed is the stretching of the vertical serifs. These conspire to fill the space and close the letter; which in extreme cases render it abstract and difficult to decipher. This idea is reinterpreted in Claymore as an additional sabre-like stroke rather than a serif. [fig 4]

D2 Cly 06

4. Top shows Missal Capitals, Stephenson Blake, 1880
Bottom shows Lombardic Capitals, Frederic Goudy, 1929

We’re incredibly adept at recognising the shapes of the alphabet and readily accept slight modifications to them. Adding details like a serif or a bulb terminal doesn’t generally worry us. We accept the different shapes of certain letters, such as a two-bowled or single-bowled g. Some typefaces make use of added details for legibility reasons; a curved foot to the lowercase l or a capital I with top and bottom slab serifs added. (As a reader you could probably benefit from that in the previous sentence). So, is there potential to incorporate additional strokes across a wider range of characters, without digressing into the realms of a semi-sans or semi-serif typeface style?

D1 Cly 04

5. Horizontal strokes added to J A H

D1 Cly 06

6. Uncial inspired N M with horizontal strokes

D1 Cly 05

7. Angular shaped curves for C G

D1 Cly 01

8. Lowercase a inspired by Gothic shaping. This paved the way to the added stroke in its final design

D1 Cly 02

9. Possibly adding cupped details to the ends of strokes

D1 Cly 03

10. Incorporating a deep dip to reflect that seen in the Lombardic letter

The early sketches looked toward a more medieval style to see if there was any value in developing their idiosyncratic shapes further. Although interesting individually, they were too far from the intended vision for Claymore. But, they did raise questions as to which letters visually accepted an additional stroke, and that a horizontal stroke appeared to reinforce an overly medieval appearance. [figs 5–10]

D4 Cly 02

11. Old Style Grotesque, Stephenson Blake. Roy Millington dates this typeface to 1879 and that it was cut by Parisian letter-cutter M. Jean Rochaix

D3 Cly 03

12. Facade and Epitaph, Boston Type Foundry

A few 19th century typefaces make use of this feature. In Old Style Grotesque from Stephenson Blake, the vertical serifs have been extended and thickened to visually become more like a stroke. [fig 11] Some of the typefaces produced by the Boston Type Foundry in the 1880s display this feature too. Both Facade and Epitaph apply a sabre-like stroke to the curved letters of their character sets. [fig 12] It could be argued that in all these designs this element is treated as a stroke rather than a serif.

This additional stroke was added to Claymore’s capital straight letters E F L T, the rounded ones of C G, and to the diagonal Z. Elsewhere in the typeface the stroke appears where it sits naturally and space allows; the lowercase a c r, figures 2 and 7, and the ? Its shape can also be seen in the ear and link of the g, and the tail of Q. [figs 13, 14, 15]

D2 Cly 07

13. Early sketch showing various letter sets and angular curves

D1 Cly 07

14. Trace development drawings

D1 Cly S02

15. The sabre-like stroke

D3 Cly 05

The branching arch
In the roman, the bowls of B D P R maintain a strong horizontal feel which then sweep round. The italic however, expresses a very different structure. It’s often the case that the italic capital letters of a typeface are treated as sloped versions of the roman ones. With Claymore I was keen to even up the balance of an italic impression between the upper and lower cases; developing a specific identity for the capitals helped to achieve this. Several of the them adopt a very different construction, with a top curve that branches out from the stem. This branching idea is also applied to the top arms of E and F. [fig 21]

The Lombardic letters visually hint at this through the deep dip where the bowl joins the back stem – which gives the impression of a more fluid curve leaping up and forward, as seen in the D of Frederic Goudy’s Lombardic Capitals. [fig 16] In a similar way, the swash capital B of University of Californian Old Style Italic, also by Goudy, hints at a fluid high bowl branching away from the lower flat stroke and stem. [fig 17]

D1 Cly 08

16. D from Lombardic Capitals, Frederic Goudy, 1929

D3 Cly 06

17. University of Californian Old Style Italic, Frederic Goudy, 1939

D3 Cly 07

18. The typeface Série 18, Deberny & Peignot, c.1906

Developing this idea further the curve of the bowl could be treated like the branching arch of a lowercase n or r. An idea which is seen in several italic capitals of Série 18 from Deberny & Peignot. In his research for a revival of Linotype Transit, type designer Ryan Bugden traced the origins of Série 18 to a specimen dated 1906. Bugden suggests that this type was the result of Deberny & Peignot’s then Director, George Peignot, ‘who made it his primary goal to design typefaces that celebrated and represented the turn of the century.’ Seen here, this detail does indeed express the joie de vivre of the Belle Époche. [fig 18]

D1 Cly 09

19. Washington, Central Type Foundry, c.1880s

D2 Cly 08

20. Design for lettering and numbers, C.F.A. Voysey, 1895

Washington, a typeface from the Central Type Foundry of St. Louis, extends its stems up to terminate in a ‘thorn’ allowing the heads of D R B to be round and branch out. This design also incorporates the added stroke to its capital L. [fig 19] Designer C.F.A. Voysey shows a branching arch in his roman capitals for the design of an alphabet in 1895. An alphabet which he used on his architectural plans and one that seems to heavily reflect the revivalist style of the period. [fig 20] Parallels can be made to the bifurcated style of the Tuscan letter, and to a degree this can be seen in some of the more ornate Lombardic letters, such as those used on the monument to Henry 3rd in Westminster Abbey. [fig 3]

D2 Cly 09

21. Sketch showing different construction of roman and italic capitals

The energy and direction seen in the branching arch is reflected in the full curves Claymore’s roman and italic C c e which swing down and round in a forward direction. To complete this dynamic feeling, the lower left corners of both italic E and L adopt a curve and echo this movement too. [figs 21, 22]

D4 Cly 04

22. Directional curves

D2 Cly 10

23. Roman figure sketches

The figures are designed to express similar ideas to those found in the letters and includes the sabre-like stroke added to the 2 and 7. The 3 has a flat unadorned top to complement the 5, the 4 is open which allows for a modelled stroke to reflect the sabre idea – it also avoids a problematic tight junction. [figs 23, 24, 25]

D3 Cly 04

24. The 4 is much closer to its final shape, and to avoid confusion with a capital R, the expressive stroke used for the bottom of 2 was dropped.

D1 Cly 11

25. Trace drawing for the heaviest weight of 4

Claymore began as an investigation into Gothic Revival and its influence on Modernism. The final typeface is a subtly modulated sans serif with an equally subtle hint of gothic inspiration. Its striking image performs exceptionally well across its wide range of weights. The many details have been crafted to deliver an engaging and clear image in text, with a strong individual personality when used at display sizes.

D3 Cly 09
D3 Cly 10

Further reading 

Bartram, Alan. Fascia lettering in the British Isles, Lund Humphries, 1978

Bugden, Ryan. The process behind a revival of Linotype Transit, Koninklijke Academie van Beeldende Kunsten, Master Type & Media, 2019

Goudy, Frederic. Typologia, studies in type design & type making, University of California Press, 1940

—. A half century of type design & typography, Two volumes, The Typophiles, 1946

—. The alphabet, William Edwin Rudge, 1918

Gray, Nicolette. A history of lettering, Phaidon Press, 1986

Day, Lewis F. Alphabets old and new, Batsford, 1910

Jaspert, W. P., Berry, W. T., and Johnson, A.F. The encyclopaedia of typefaces, Blandford Press, 1970

Linvingstone, Karen, Donnelly, Max, and Parry, Linda. C.F.A. Voysey, Arts & Crafts designer, V&A Publishing, 2016

Mediavilla, Claude. Calligraphy, Scirpus Publications, 1996

Millington, Roy. Stephenson Blake the last of the old English typefounders, The British Library & Oak Knoll Press, 2002

Olmert, Michael. The Smithsonian book of books, Smithsonian Books, 1992

Pevsner, Nikolaus. Pioneers of modern design, The Museum of Modern Art, New York, 1949

Popular designs for artistic printers, Central Type Foundry and Boston Type Foundry, 1892

Printing types, Stephenson Blake & Co., 1937

Shaw, Henry, Alphabets & numbers of the middle ages, Studio Editions, 1990

Voysey, C.F.A. Individuality, Chapman and Hall, 1915